| « Publius New Orleans | Textile and Asides » |
Think New Orleans Project
June 2nd, 2006I’ve broached the subject of the Think New Orleans Project and now I appeal to you for your help.
Vince Keenan requested that I write a project proposal so he could obtain the approval of his Board of Directors. I created a page on the Think New Orleans Wiki. I added a few sentances. I showed it to Vince.
Vince then went an pretty much wrote the proposal for me. This explains the gross exaggeration of my abilities, and more laughably my standing among the New Orleans bloggers. Although I have a great many delusions, grandeur is not among them.
Like the resume support group, however, it is easier to present yourself, or the organization that has consumed your self, if you have the tempered input of your betters.
To the degree which you have been a particpant in Think New Orleans, and by you I mean you Ed, Ric, Nancy, Maitri, Ric, George, Bart, Scott, Becky, Morwen, Christian, Jimmy, Mark, Mikkel and you who I’ll not name, I ask you, as my better, to read, review, ammend and edit, the Think New Orleans Project, put forward by Vince.
Vince’s language reflects how a project like Think New Orleans fits within the baliwick of Publius, an organization that researches democracy as it pertains to the Internet.
This is where I find Think New Orleans, attending town hall meetings, creating audio transcriptions of town hall meetings for distribution on the web, creating web publishing workshops for civic organizations, creating workshops for web based calendaring and project management software, developing audio town halls (pending) for distrubiton on the web.
Think New Orleans is not pursuing the web as a media network, rather as the information system that DARPA intended. Although, people that are working with me are media oriented, the difference in focus is apparent.
Thus, as you help me sort this out, remember that Publius is about answering questions through active participation. It’s important to stay within the mission of the supporting entity.
The fallout from the 1900 Galviston hurricane created a new form of city government. Publius is curious about the effect of the Internet on governance in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
As we rebuild New Orleans, we will answer for ourselves, questions about citzen oversight of government, neighborhood planning, and the democratization of data, and the role of the Internet in the governance of a city that is still pedestrian and close-knit.
Publius would have us take note of the questions raised, and the answers given, so our experience can serve as a model.
Think New Orleans will not become acedemic. No, sir. I’d have to drop out.
However, I’ve spoken with a local acedemic about developing metrics for Think New Orleans. Black box testing that is agnostic about the Internet nature of this project, so we can measure the effectiveness of our contribution against unwired means of community organization.
If it is more effective to turn the digital recorders off, so be it. I have strong convictions about the importance of print. Not every flight of Internet fancy is good for community. The Publius influence will keep us honest.
Publius would have us work with print and offline meetings for the sake of contrast to the web and online meetings.
No Internet for Internet’s sake. Only where it serves democracy.
Let’s unpunch this post. Go read the Think New Orleans Project propsoal please, and have at it.
I need more words, more sense, and more New Orleans. It’s got to be something that you’ll be willing to help me with, so write down bits and pieces of what that would be.
Do try to take it lightly, though. It’s not a constitution, simply a project proposal. I’d merely like to share this opportunity to define Think New Orleans. I’d like to share the burden as well.
(2)
|

Comments 

Well, now, black box testing. As soon as I drag my ass back to work and finish the account/condition matrix for re-executing System Test One for two reports for my employer, I’ll have to give that some further thought.
Before we go further down that road, what are we trying to measure? Testing without requirements or measurement without a baseline is pretty much trying to eat your gumbo with a slotted spoon.
But this really sounds like ground for someone with a social sciences backround rather than a technical backround, as I’m not sure off the top of my head about how to measure the effectiveness of civic activity.
One thing that pops into my mind would be measuring click-throughs from the Wiki against other traffic to a selection of listed sites, say a civic group’s web page.
Don’t overthink it. The document Publius needs to put on record internally to outline it’s connection to the project doesn’t need to be the conceptual doctrine of ThinkNOLA (not that that would be a bad thing, it’s just not our mandate).
To that end, let it be known there are no requirements or metrics that Publius needs at this point. If you start strangling cats or abducting voters, we’d probably question that. Short of that, as long as we collectively learn something (and stay as politically objective as possible) we’re good.